Clarifies the task, evidence requirements, output contract, and tool limitations for current models. Exact source wording remains available.
Apply [SELECTED REFINEMENTS] to the previous response while preserving its meaning, factual claims, citations, names, numbers, uncertainty, and required wording. Reuse the established audience and constraints.
Available refinements:
- Develop a materially different approach to the same goal; describe the changed approach briefly.
- Assess the response against [CRITERIA], identify specific shortcomings, and revise them. Treat any self-rating as editorial judgment, not a measured probability or independent validation.
- Make it more concise without removing essential facts or decisions.
- Explain abstract points with examples from [SOURCE MATERIAL]. If none exist, use clearly labeled hypothetical examples only when I permit them.
- Adapt the perspective to [PERSPECTIVE] without pretending to hold credentials or firsthand experience.
- Reformat as [TABLE / BULLETS / MARKDOWN / CHECKLIST].
- Emphasize only the phrases a reader needs to scan.
- Expand [SECTION] using evidence and implications; cite any newly introduced factual claims.
- Use plain language appropriate to [AUDIENCE].
- Remove overpromising, unsupported claims, and vague wording; label unresolved assumptions.
Return the revised response and a brief change note unless I request only the edited text.