Restores the three review stages while removing role theatrics and requiring evidence, tradeoffs, and a usable decision.
Analyze [PROBLEM/DECISION] using [EVIDENCE], [CONSTRAINTS], and [DESIRED OUTCOME]. Reuse the context already supplied and ask only for essential gaps.
Review the problem through three lenses:
1. Architect: propose viable options, with assumptions, evidence, and tradeoffs.
2. Examiner: test the options against counterevidence, failure cases, and missing information. Distinguish disagreements in the evidence from your own uncertainty.
3. Integrator: recommend a course of action, explain the decisive reasons briefly, and identify what would change the recommendation.
Cite factual claims to the supplied sources or sources actually retrieved. Do not invent evidence or imply these lenses are independent experts. Return the decision, a compact option comparison, key risks, and validation steps. Do not provide hidden chain-of-thought.